The Casus Obligationis Attributed to William Heytesbury

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00549174" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00549174 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://cimagl.saxo.ku.dk/download/no.-90/90hanke226-264.pdf" target="_blank" >https://cimagl.saxo.ku.dk/download/no.-90/90hanke226-264.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Casus Obligationis Attributed to William Heytesbury

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Casus obligationis is a short fourteenth-century collection of five epistemic sophisms, preserved in four fourteenth- and fifteenth-century manuscripts. The text has attracted scholars’ attention due to its attribution to William Heytesbury. The treatise follows the second chapter of Heytesbury’s Regule solvendi sophismata in discussing issues of epistemic logic, but diverges from this source in several interesting ways. The present study present a critical edition of the text, discusses its relation to Regule solvendi sophismata, and analyses some of its basic features, namely the endorsement of the framework of obligationes, the distinction between two basic forms of modal statements (the so-called sensus compositus and sensus divisus), the problem of logical omniscience, and the Bradwardinian theory of sentential meaning as closed under entailment.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Casus Obligationis Attributed to William Heytesbury

Popis výsledku anglicky

Casus obligationis is a short fourteenth-century collection of five epistemic sophisms, preserved in four fourteenth- and fifteenth-century manuscripts. The text has attracted scholars’ attention due to its attribution to William Heytesbury. The treatise follows the second chapter of Heytesbury’s Regule solvendi sophismata in discussing issues of epistemic logic, but diverges from this source in several interesting ways. The present study present a critical edition of the text, discusses its relation to Regule solvendi sophismata, and analyses some of its basic features, namely the endorsement of the framework of obligationes, the distinction between two basic forms of modal statements (the so-called sensus compositus and sensus divisus), the problem of logical omniscience, and the Bradwardinian theory of sentential meaning as closed under entailment.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GB14-37038G" target="_blank" >GB14-37038G: Mezi renesancí a barokem: Filosofie a vědění v českých zemích a jejich širší evropský kontext</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin

ISSN

0591-0358

e-ISSN

1904-9196

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

90

Stát vydavatele periodika

DK - Dánské království

Počet stran výsledku

39

Strana od-do

226-264

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—