Precariousness of Social Conditions and The Generosity of Nature in Marx’s Debates on Wood Theft

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00568932" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00568932 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Precariousness of Social Conditions and The Generosity of Nature in Marx’s Debates on Wood Theft

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The transition from wild nature through industrial nature to post-industrial nature reveals various forms of precarisation, whose common denominator is not the threat of scarcity, but rather the excess that is brazenly monopolized by a few exclusive owners. In the case of wild nature or industrial nature, most people may still think that it does not concern them, because only the poorest are affected, and they are certainly to blame. But when we come to post-industrial nature and understand the processes that Shoshana Zuboff describes, we suddenly realize that Marx’s question of whether all private property is not ultimately theft, since it denies property to someone else, concerns us most personally. For the property in question is ourselves, and nothing can assure us that we are not being denied our own being.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Precariousness of Social Conditions and The Generosity of Nature in Marx’s Debates on Wood Theft

Popis výsledku anglicky

The transition from wild nature through industrial nature to post-industrial nature reveals various forms of precarisation, whose common denominator is not the threat of scarcity, but rather the excess that is brazenly monopolized by a few exclusive owners. In the case of wild nature or industrial nature, most people may still think that it does not concern them, because only the poorest are affected, and they are certainly to blame. But when we come to post-industrial nature and understand the processes that Shoshana Zuboff describes, we suddenly realize that Marx’s question of whether all private property is not ultimately theft, since it denies property to someone else, concerns us most personally. For the property in question is ourselves, and nothing can assure us that we are not being denied our own being.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-20031S" target="_blank" >GA19-20031S: K nové ontologii společenské soudržnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

On the shores of civility

ISBN

978-80-973277-3-6

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

99-118

Počet stran knihy

121

Název nakladatele

VortexT

Místo vydání

Prešov

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—