The World and Its Nightmare (Levinas on Sense and Nonsense)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00571589" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00571589 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09662-w" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09662-w</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09662-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10746-023-09662-w</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The World and Its Nightmare (Levinas on Sense and Nonsense)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This text deals with the interpretation of where the meaningfulness of existence and our being in the world in Emmanuel Levinas’s conception originates in its contrast to the similar conception developed by phenomenology of appearing which is represented by M. Heidegger and H. Maldiney. I want to show on what premises Levinas argues that the epiphany of sense can only emerge in the case of a continuous overcoming of the nonsense of appearing and thus of Being as such. Therefore, I intend to go through the steps of Levinas’ reasoning, which he never developed systematically, and explain why he can view Being as nonsensical and what this notion of nonsense could possibly mean in Levinas’s philosophy. As a result, I would like present an implicit argumentation behind Levinas’s well-known claim that the birth of sense must be of ethical origin and cannot arise through the process of appearing or Being alone.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The World and Its Nightmare (Levinas on Sense and Nonsense)

Popis výsledku anglicky

This text deals with the interpretation of where the meaningfulness of existence and our being in the world in Emmanuel Levinas’s conception originates in its contrast to the similar conception developed by phenomenology of appearing which is represented by M. Heidegger and H. Maldiney. I want to show on what premises Levinas argues that the epiphany of sense can only emerge in the case of a continuous overcoming of the nonsense of appearing and thus of Being as such. Therefore, I intend to go through the steps of Levinas’ reasoning, which he never developed systematically, and explain why he can view Being as nonsensical and what this notion of nonsense could possibly mean in Levinas’s philosophy. As a result, I would like present an implicit argumentation behind Levinas’s well-known claim that the birth of sense must be of ethical origin and cannot arise through the process of appearing or Being alone.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA21-22224S" target="_blank" >GA21-22224S: "Tvář přírody" v současné francouzské fenomenologii. Výzvy nové meta-etiky a ekologie</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Human Studies

ISSN

0163-8548

e-ISSN

1572-851X

Svazek periodika

46

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

79-99

Kód UT WoS článku

000924651800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85147372362