Validity of Cognitive ability tests ? comparison of computerized adaptive testing with paper and pencil and computer-based forms of administrations

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F12%3A00380979" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/12:00380979 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Validity of Cognitive ability tests ? comparison of computerized adaptive testing with paper and pencil and computer-based forms of administrations

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The study analyzes and compares the validity of computerized adaptive testing, paper and pencil and computer-based forms of cognitive abilities tests. The research was conducted on a sample of 803 secondary school students (567 paper and pencil, 236 computer-based/computerized adaptive administration; 363 males, 440 females), their mean age was 16.8 years (SD = 1.33). The test set consisted of the Test of Intellect Potential and the Vienna Matrices Test. Overall results showed that the validity of CAT was reasonably comparable across administration modes. Consistent with previous research, CAT selecting only a small number of items gave results which, in terms of validity, were only marginally different from the results of traditional administration. CAT simulated administration of the TIP was roughly 55% and VMT 54 % more economical than the traditional version. These results indicate that CAT is a useful way of improving methodology of psychological testing.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Validity of Cognitive ability tests ? comparison of computerized adaptive testing with paper and pencil and computer-based forms of administrations

Popis výsledku anglicky

The study analyzes and compares the validity of computerized adaptive testing, paper and pencil and computer-based forms of cognitive abilities tests. The research was conducted on a sample of 803 secondary school students (567 paper and pencil, 236 computer-based/computerized adaptive administration; 363 males, 440 females), their mean age was 16.8 years (SD = 1.33). The test set consisted of the Test of Intellect Potential and the Vienna Matrices Test. Overall results showed that the validity of CAT was reasonably comparable across administration modes. Consistent with previous research, CAT selecting only a small number of items gave results which, in terms of validity, were only marginally different from the results of traditional administration. CAT simulated administration of the TIP was roughly 55% and VMT 54 % more economical than the traditional version. These results indicate that CAT is a useful way of improving methodology of psychological testing.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AN - Psychologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP406%2F09%2FP284" target="_blank" >GP406/09/P284: Problematika polytomních IRT modelů v oblasti psychologie osobnosti a jejich implementace do software CATO</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Psychologica

ISSN

0039-3320

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

54

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

181-194

Kód UT WoS článku

000310489100002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—