Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68145535%3A_____%2F21%3A00539085" target="_blank" >RIV/68145535:_____/21:00539085 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/2/140/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/2/140/htm</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13020140" target="_blank" >10.3390/w13020140</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Based on the literature review, this paper synthesizes recent state of knowledge on flood risk perception and related human behaviors. The main attention is paid to private precautionary and mitigation measures, and the reasons why these are (not) adopted by agents such as individual households. Results of a wide range of relevant studies are presented and critically examined. The findings are presented within an interpretive framework established during the review process, six key themes (responsibility, risk perception, people and social environment, geography of risk, emotions, theories and conceptual models) and several sub-themes closely related to them were identified by the content/thematic analysis. These were then utilized to overview and discuss particular factors and issues involved, as well as various relevant theoretical underpinnings and conceptual models. The review identifies, illustrates, and addresses not only the consensual views and contradictory findings of flood risk research, but also several related and essential ambiguities, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research are discussed, including the terminological, semantic, methodological, theoretical, and ethical aspects. The paper thus serves two main tasks: (a) It is a useful reference/departure point for those with research interests in topics and issues such as flood risk perception, flood risk protective and mitigation behaviors and measures, or flood risk management in general, and (b) it provides suggestions and incentives for future flood risk research agenda.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Based on the literature review, this paper synthesizes recent state of knowledge on flood risk perception and related human behaviors. The main attention is paid to private precautionary and mitigation measures, and the reasons why these are (not) adopted by agents such as individual households. Results of a wide range of relevant studies are presented and critically examined. The findings are presented within an interpretive framework established during the review process, six key themes (responsibility, risk perception, people and social environment, geography of risk, emotions, theories and conceptual models) and several sub-themes closely related to them were identified by the content/thematic analysis. These were then utilized to overview and discuss particular factors and issues involved, as well as various relevant theoretical underpinnings and conceptual models. The review identifies, illustrates, and addresses not only the consensual views and contradictory findings of flood risk research, but also several related and essential ambiguities, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research are discussed, including the terminological, semantic, methodological, theoretical, and ethical aspects. The paper thus serves two main tasks: (a) It is a useful reference/departure point for those with research interests in topics and issues such as flood risk perception, flood risk protective and mitigation behaviors and measures, or flood risk management in general, and (b) it provides suggestions and incentives for future flood risk research agenda.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA20-11782S" target="_blank" >GA20-11782S: Povaha a dynamika lokálních konfliktů o využití území v polyracionálním prostředí</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Water

  • ISSN

    2073-4441

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    13

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CH - Švýcarská konfederace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    35

  • Strana od-do

    140

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000611754100001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85099779299