(In)correctness in Czech toponymy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378092%3A_____%2F24%3A00647749" target="_blank" >RIV/68378092:_____/24:00647749 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://2_11_Pavel_Stepan_ICONN_6.pdf" target="_blank" >http://2_11_Pavel_Stepan_ICONN_6.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.30816/ICONN6/2023/29" target="_blank" >10.30816/ICONN6/2023/29</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
(In)correctness in Czech toponymy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper compares different aspects of (in)correctness in toponyms. Five spheres of (in)correctness have been delimited: (1) appropriate realization of basic onymic functions (a toponym should unambiguously identify the named object and reliably distinguish it from the other objects in the given locality), (2) factual correctness, (3) linguistic correctness (displayed on several linguistic levels), (4) legal correctness (toponyms should be in accordance with the Municipalities Act), and (5) political correctness (a highly changeable sphere, resulting in frequent changes especially in street nomenclature). All of these aspects should be taken into account during the standardization of a name. However, rather many standardized names are “incorrect” in a way, their “incorrectness” may belong to any or all the aforementioned spheres. The most frequent conflicts are found in the linguistic sphere, they include even systematic conflicts resulting from changes of linguistic rules and their ignorance by local authorities.
Název v anglickém jazyce
(In)correctness in Czech toponymy
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper compares different aspects of (in)correctness in toponyms. Five spheres of (in)correctness have been delimited: (1) appropriate realization of basic onymic functions (a toponym should unambiguously identify the named object and reliably distinguish it from the other objects in the given locality), (2) factual correctness, (3) linguistic correctness (displayed on several linguistic levels), (4) legal correctness (toponyms should be in accordance with the Municipalities Act), and (5) political correctness (a highly changeable sphere, resulting in frequent changes especially in street nomenclature). All of these aspects should be taken into account during the standardization of a name. However, rather many standardized names are “incorrect” in a way, their “incorrectness” may belong to any or all the aforementioned spheres. The most frequent conflicts are found in the linguistic sphere, they include even systematic conflicts resulting from changes of linguistic rules and their ignorance by local authorities.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Name and Naming. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Onomastics. (In)correctness in Onomastics
ISBN
—
ISSN
2501-0727
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
373-382
Název nakladatele
MEGA
Místo vydání
Cluj-Napoca
Místo konání akce
Baia Mare
Datum konání akce
5. 9. 2023
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—