The Czech Constitutional Court and Non- Justiciability: The Emergence of the Political Question Doctrine?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378122%3A_____%2F24%3A00604360" target="_blank" >RIV/68378122:_____/24:00604360 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=JournalsEUROEURO2024016.pdf" target="_blank" >https://kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=JournalsEUROEURO2024016.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2024016" target="_blank" >10.54648/euro2024016</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Czech Constitutional Court and Non- Justiciability: The Emergence of the Political Question Doctrine?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Czech Constitutional Court (CC) is frequently described as a strong and, occasionally, an activist constitutional court. However, a varied range of cases has arisen in which the CC has carried only a limited judicial review or has declined to exercise any judicial review at all. This has been due to the fact that the CC has taken the view those cases are related to political questions which are normally justiciable to only a limited extent or non-justiciable at all. In light of these cases and, also, their justification, related especially to the separation of powers, a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards or the necessity of deference to the political branches, there are strong grounds to argue that a sort of political question doctrine has emerged in the case-law of the CC. Although a recourse to such a doctrine may appear unusual in the context of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region, it is believed the doctrine can have an added value in that it can shield the CC from excessive politicization and permit the CC to tailor the extent in which it interferes with both macro- or micro-politics.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Czech Constitutional Court and Non- Justiciability: The Emergence of the Political Question Doctrine?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Czech Constitutional Court (CC) is frequently described as a strong and, occasionally, an activist constitutional court. However, a varied range of cases has arisen in which the CC has carried only a limited judicial review or has declined to exercise any judicial review at all. This has been due to the fact that the CC has taken the view those cases are related to political questions which are normally justiciable to only a limited extent or non-justiciable at all. In light of these cases and, also, their justification, related especially to the separation of powers, a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards or the necessity of deference to the political branches, there are strong grounds to argue that a sort of political question doctrine has emerged in the case-law of the CC. Although a recourse to such a doctrine may appear unusual in the context of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region, it is believed the doctrine can have an added value in that it can shield the CC from excessive politicization and permit the CC to tailor the extent in which it interferes with both macro- or micro-politics.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Public Law

ISSN

1354-3725

e-ISSN

1875-8207

Svazek periodika

30

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

413-440

Kód UT WoS článku

001377515600004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—