Comparison of methods for georeferencing of multiple sheets map serie - Muller's map od Moravia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F16%3A00243255" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/16:00243255 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33019.92964" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33019.92964</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33019.92964" target="_blank" >10.13140/RG.2.2.33019.92964</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of methods for georeferencing of multiple sheets map serie - Muller's map od Moravia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper addresses a problematic aspect encountered during the georeferencing of old maps, namely georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Currently, there are several methods available for the georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Each method has its specificities and can be used in different cases. The paper describes and compares two methods. The simplest option is to merge the map sheets into one unit and successively georeference the entire map series. The second compared method is based on the adjustment with conditions. Each map sheet is georeferenced separately and conditions are added for the transformation to guarantee that the corners of adjoining map sheets fit. The comparison of the above examples was performed for Müller’s Map of Moravia. In particular, the results of global transformation methods were compared – affine transformation and second-order polynomial transformation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of methods for georeferencing of multiple sheets map serie - Muller's map od Moravia

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper addresses a problematic aspect encountered during the georeferencing of old maps, namely georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Currently, there are several methods available for the georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Each method has its specificities and can be used in different cases. The paper describes and compares two methods. The simplest option is to merge the map sheets into one unit and successively georeference the entire map series. The second compared method is based on the adjustment with conditions. Each map sheet is georeferenced separately and conditions are added for the transformation to guarantee that the corners of adjoining map sheets fit. The comparison of the above examples was performed for Müller’s Map of Moravia. In particular, the results of global transformation methods were compared – affine transformation and second-order polynomial transformation.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

DE - Zemský magnetismus, geodesie, geografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings - 6th International Conference on Cartography and GIS

ISBN

—

ISSN

1314-0604

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

343-350

Název nakladatele

Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

Místo vydání

Sofia

Místo konání akce

Albena

Datum konání akce

12. 6. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—