Analysis of Static Plate Load Test Results According to Czech, French, and German Methodologies
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F25%3A00380479" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/25:00380479 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-025-00542-7" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-025-00542-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40515-025-00542-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s40515-025-00542-7</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Analysis of Static Plate Load Test Results According to Czech, French, and German Methodologies
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Many countries have a specific way of performing and evaluating the static plateload test for assessing the railway substructure deformation resistance, so its valuescannot be easily compared for different countries. This paper describes an experi-mental study that compares the evaluated results of performed static plate load testsaccording to Czech, French, and German methodologies. To obtain comparableresults, several measurement campaigns were carried out on test layers of crushedaggregates in experimental conditions and on a subgrade surface of soil stabilizedby hydraulic binders or on sub-ballast layers of crushed aggregates on real railwaytrack structures. The results were further statistically evaluated by arranging themin graphs, and the mutual correlations between individual methods were found. Thedependence of the results turned out to be polynomial. For the comparison regard-ing the tested subsoil material, the correlation appeared to be better for aggregatesthan for stabilized soils. The performed experimental study aimed to compare theresults of the static plate load test according to the mentioned methodologies and toestablish mutual correlations between them. Its results can be used for adapting therequirements for the deformation resistance of the railway substructure defined inforeign standards to the Czech environment.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Analysis of Static Plate Load Test Results According to Czech, French, and German Methodologies
Popis výsledku anglicky
Many countries have a specific way of performing and evaluating the static plateload test for assessing the railway substructure deformation resistance, so its valuescannot be easily compared for different countries. This paper describes an experi-mental study that compares the evaluated results of performed static plate load testsaccording to Czech, French, and German methodologies. To obtain comparableresults, several measurement campaigns were carried out on test layers of crushedaggregates in experimental conditions and on a subgrade surface of soil stabilizedby hydraulic binders or on sub-ballast layers of crushed aggregates on real railwaytrack structures. The results were further statistically evaluated by arranging themin graphs, and the mutual correlations between individual methods were found. Thedependence of the results turned out to be polynomial. For the comparison regard-ing the tested subsoil material, the correlation appeared to be better for aggregatesthan for stabilized soils. The performed experimental study aimed to compare theresults of the static plate load test according to the mentioned methodologies and toestablish mutual correlations between them. Its results can be used for adapting therequirements for the deformation resistance of the railway substructure defined inforeign standards to the Czech environment.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20101 - Civil engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/CK02000293" target="_blank" >CK02000293: Adaptace francouzské metody hodnocení konstrukce pražcového podloží pro vysokorychlostní železniční tratě do podmínek ČR</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology
ISSN
2196-7202
e-ISSN
2196-7210
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
001410616500002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85219693122