Deep Versus Broad Knowledge in Interdisciplinary Education
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F14%3A00224019" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/14:00224019 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE.2014.6879387" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE.2014.6879387</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE.2014.6879387" target="_blank" >10.1109/EAEEIE.2014.6879387</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Deep Versus Broad Knowledge in Interdisciplinary Education
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Development in interdisciplinary areas has become faster in recent decades and encompasses many fields. Specialists in individual fields naturally regard their own area for the most important one. This brings quite frequently tension to discussions aboutnew curricula development or restructuring existing curricula. However, we have to keep in mind that the curricula has limited number of courses, should be studied in limited time and it is impossible to think that students become experts in all studiedfields. We discussed and analysed these issues many times in EAEEIE, various projects and with experts from the industry and other areas where the graduates find their jobs. The conclusion we agreed on is that in particular in engineering the study mustnot be separated from reality and real-life applications. In the paper we will discuss these issues in more detail and show on the case of computer science courses and biomedical engineering program how difficult is to define properly th
Název v anglickém jazyce
Deep Versus Broad Knowledge in Interdisciplinary Education
Popis výsledku anglicky
Development in interdisciplinary areas has become faster in recent decades and encompasses many fields. Specialists in individual fields naturally regard their own area for the most important one. This brings quite frequently tension to discussions aboutnew curricula development or restructuring existing curricula. However, we have to keep in mind that the curricula has limited number of courses, should be studied in limited time and it is impossible to think that students become experts in all studiedfields. We discussed and analysed these issues many times in EAEEIE, various projects and with experts from the industry and other areas where the graduates find their jobs. The conclusion we agreed on is that in particular in engineering the study mustnot be separated from reality and real-life applications. In the paper we will discuss these issues in more detail and show on the case of computer science courses and biomedical engineering program how difficult is to define properly th
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
JC - Počítačový hardware a software
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering
ISBN
978-1-4799-4205-3
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
61-64
Název nakladatele
IEEE
Místo vydání
Piscataway
Místo konání akce
Cesme
Datum konání akce
30. 5. 2014
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000345865400016