Comparison of the Flight Centric and Conventional Air Traffic Control

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F19%3A00340018" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/19:00340018 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2019.8735109" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2019.8735109</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2019.8735109" target="_blank" >10.1109/ICNSURV.2019.8735109</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of the Flight Centric and Conventional Air Traffic Control

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Air-Traffic management (ATM) is a very complex system. Increasing air traffic and demands on the efficiency of the ATM system requires improvement of the ATM system. One of the possible improvements is the application of flight centric concept. Conventional air traffic control organizes airspace into sectors. Each sector is controlled by one or more air traffic controllers that have full responsibility for assigned airspace. Flight centric control is a new concept where the airspace is shared by multiple ATCOs. Each ATCO has assigned a group of aircraft. The flight centric approach provides better flexibility to balance workload but requires additional coordination between ATCOs in case of aircraft interaction (e.g., conflict resolution).The paper presents a comparison of conventional and flight centric approach. This approach is applied to the airspace of the Czech Republic. Scenarios were simulated using conventional and flight centric approach. In both approaches were used dynamic sectorization optimizing workload of ATCOs. Results compare a number of ATCOs needed to control traffic sample and workload metrics.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of the Flight Centric and Conventional Air Traffic Control

Popis výsledku anglicky

Air-Traffic management (ATM) is a very complex system. Increasing air traffic and demands on the efficiency of the ATM system requires improvement of the ATM system. One of the possible improvements is the application of flight centric concept. Conventional air traffic control organizes airspace into sectors. Each sector is controlled by one or more air traffic controllers that have full responsibility for assigned airspace. Flight centric control is a new concept where the airspace is shared by multiple ATCOs. Each ATCO has assigned a group of aircraft. The flight centric approach provides better flexibility to balance workload but requires additional coordination between ATCOs in case of aircraft interaction (e.g., conflict resolution).The paper presents a comparison of conventional and flight centric approach. This approach is applied to the airspace of the Czech Republic. Scenarios were simulated using conventional and flight centric approach. In both approaches were used dynamic sectorization optimizing workload of ATCOs. Results compare a number of ATCOs needed to control traffic sample and workload metrics.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of 2019 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference

ISBN

978-1-7281-1893-2

ISSN

2155-4943

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

IEEE Xplore

Místo vydání

—

Místo konání akce

Herndon

Datum konání akce

9. 4. 2019

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—