Snow Load Models for Probabilistic Optimization of Steel Frames

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21610%2F13%3A00215356" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21610/13:00215356 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.06.004" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.06.004</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.06.004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.06.004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Snow Load Models for Probabilistic Optimization of Steel Frames

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

A comparison of reliability levels of steel structures designed according to Eurocodes and standards of the Russian Federation is provided. The major differences between basic principles of the both standards (such as load combinations, system of partialfactors) with a particular focus on design of steel structures are described. The main parameters characterizing load effects and resistances are compared at a general level. In a numerical example reliability of generic steel members is then analysed for different combinations of permanent and variable actions. It appears that in most cases standards of the Russian Federation lead to a lower reliability level than Eurocodes. The main reason of this difference is attributed to specification of design values of permanent and variable loads. For both considered systems of standards, reliability of structures exposed to snow load is significantly lower than for structures subjected to imposed load and harmonisation is required.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Snow Load Models for Probabilistic Optimization of Steel Frames

Popis výsledku anglicky

A comparison of reliability levels of steel structures designed according to Eurocodes and standards of the Russian Federation is provided. The major differences between basic principles of the both standards (such as load combinations, system of partialfactors) with a particular focus on design of steel structures are described. The main parameters characterizing load effects and resistances are compared at a general level. In a numerical example reliability of generic steel members is then analysed for different combinations of permanent and variable actions. It appears that in most cases standards of the Russian Federation lead to a lower reliability level than Eurocodes. The main reason of this difference is attributed to specification of design values of permanent and variable loads. For both considered systems of standards, reliability of structures exposed to snow load is significantly lower than for structures subjected to imposed load and harmonisation is required.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

JN - Stavebnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP105%2F12%2F0589" target="_blank" >GAP105/12/0589: Pravděpodobnostní optimalizace směrné spolehlivosti stavebních konstrukcí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cold Regions Science and Technology

ISSN

0165-232X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

94

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

13-20

Kód UT WoS článku

000324444700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—