Quality in differentiation of instruction with respect to development of pupils' giftedness - self-evaluation of teachers
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F16%3A43874402" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/16:43874402 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.0696" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.0696</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.0696" target="_blank" >10.21125/iceri.2016.0696</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Quality in differentiation of instruction with respect to development of pupils' giftedness - self-evaluation of teachers
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article deals with differentiation of instruction in context of inclusive education on the level of lower-secondary schools (ISCED 2) in the Czech Republic. The aim is to evaluate the quality in differentiation of instruction with respect to development of pupils' giftedness and to compare the quality according to chosen teachers' characteristics. 609 teachers took part in the study. They evaluated their quality of differentiation in a questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis showed 2 factors covering the original 9 items, first of them is focused on curriculum differentiation, the second one is aimed at the differentiation of teaching methods. They together explain 45 % of total variance and their overall internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach's α = 0,77). The findings show, that teachers are more able to differentiate curriculum, than to differentiate didactic approaches in a heterogeneous classroom. Women cope with differentiation better than men. Teachers working predominantly in humanities cope with differentiation better than those who work mainly in natural sciences. Expert teachers have better results than beginners. Certificated teachers show the same level of quality in comparison to the uncertificated ones.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Quality in differentiation of instruction with respect to development of pupils' giftedness - self-evaluation of teachers
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article deals with differentiation of instruction in context of inclusive education on the level of lower-secondary schools (ISCED 2) in the Czech Republic. The aim is to evaluate the quality in differentiation of instruction with respect to development of pupils' giftedness and to compare the quality according to chosen teachers' characteristics. 609 teachers took part in the study. They evaluated their quality of differentiation in a questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis showed 2 factors covering the original 9 items, first of them is focused on curriculum differentiation, the second one is aimed at the differentiation of teaching methods. They together explain 45 % of total variance and their overall internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach's α = 0,77). The findings show, that teachers are more able to differentiate curriculum, than to differentiate didactic approaches in a heterogeneous classroom. Women cope with differentiation better than men. Teachers working predominantly in humanities cope with differentiation better than those who work mainly in natural sciences. Expert teachers have better results than beginners. Certificated teachers show the same level of quality in comparison to the uncertificated ones.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AM - Pedagogika a školství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
ICERI2016 Proceedings
ISBN
978-84-617-5895-1
ISSN
2340-1095
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
7421-7426
Název nakladatele
IATED Academy
Místo vydání
Seville
Místo konání akce
Španělsko, Seville
Datum konání akce
14. 11. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—