Differences in the metacognitive and discursive activities between regular and IBL mathematics lessons
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F21%3A63533559" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/21:63533559 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://erie.pef.czu.cz/en/r-17410-proceedings-2021/proceedings-2021.html" target="_blank" >https://erie.pef.czu.cz/en/r-17410-proceedings-2021/proceedings-2021.html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Differences in the metacognitive and discursive activities between regular and IBL mathematics lessons
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Inquiry-based learning is considered as an effective approach to mathematics education. Teachers often struggle when starting to use IBL in their practice. The courses for professional development of mathematics teachers often involve pedagogical experimenting and subsequent reflection. The differences in metacognitive and discursive activities between regular lessons and the lessons based on the lesson plan designed by the internationally recognised expert taught by the participants of CPD were analysed quantitatively based on the video-recordings of the lessons. The several-step planning typical for the regular lessons was replaced by metacognitive planning during the IBL lessons. The wilful disruption was significantly less prevalent in the IBL lessons indicating the bigger involvement of students. The episodes of the lessons were grouped more according to the type of lesson and type of activity than according to the teacher. The grouping of the episodes suggests that participating teachers might get similar experience when performing the same lesson plan.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Differences in the metacognitive and discursive activities between regular and IBL mathematics lessons
Popis výsledku anglicky
Inquiry-based learning is considered as an effective approach to mathematics education. Teachers often struggle when starting to use IBL in their practice. The courses for professional development of mathematics teachers often involve pedagogical experimenting and subsequent reflection. The differences in metacognitive and discursive activities between regular lessons and the lessons based on the lesson plan designed by the internationally recognised expert taught by the participants of CPD were analysed quantitatively based on the video-recordings of the lessons. The several-step planning typical for the regular lessons was replaced by metacognitive planning during the IBL lessons. The wilful disruption was significantly less prevalent in the IBL lessons indicating the bigger involvement of students. The episodes of the lessons were grouped more according to the type of lesson and type of activity than according to the teacher. The grouping of the episodes suggests that participating teachers might get similar experience when performing the same lesson plan.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference Efficiency and Responsibility in Education 2021
ISBN
978-80-213-3108-2
ISSN
2336-744X
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
88-97
Název nakladatele
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Místo vydání
Praha
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
3. 6. 2021
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—