Legitimisation of non-participation in adult education and training: the situational logic of decision-making
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F22%3A63553278" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/22:63553278 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02601370.2022.2057606?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02601370.2022.2057606?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2022.2057606" target="_blank" >10.1080/02601370.2022.2057606</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Legitimisation of non-participation in adult education and training: the situational logic of decision-making
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The study deals with strategies for legitimising non-participation in adult education and training (AET) in groups of people with the lowest levels of participation: low-educated workers, retired individuals and people on parental leave. It aims to identify and describe strategies for legitimising non-participation. Results are based on extensive qualitative research focused on mapping the situational determinants of non-participation in AET. For this purpose, a total of 53 semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed. Through generic coding procedure, four key strategies were identified: (1) commitment to lifelong learning; (2) preference of experience over theoretical knowledge; (3) preference of complete dedication and (4) mobilisation of past educational experience. Each group of adults has a distinct way of using the strategies to justify their non-participation. The findings contribute to our knowledge of situational rationality that is used in decision-making regarding participation in AET.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Legitimisation of non-participation in adult education and training: the situational logic of decision-making
Popis výsledku anglicky
The study deals with strategies for legitimising non-participation in adult education and training (AET) in groups of people with the lowest levels of participation: low-educated workers, retired individuals and people on parental leave. It aims to identify and describe strategies for legitimising non-participation. Results are based on extensive qualitative research focused on mapping the situational determinants of non-participation in AET. For this purpose, a total of 53 semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed. Through generic coding procedure, four key strategies were identified: (1) commitment to lifelong learning; (2) preference of experience over theoretical knowledge; (3) preference of complete dedication and (4) mobilisation of past educational experience. Each group of adults has a distinct way of using the strategies to justify their non-participation. The findings contribute to our knowledge of situational rationality that is used in decision-making regarding participation in AET.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA19-00987S" target="_blank" >GA19-00987S: Bílá místa neformálního vzdělávání dospělých v České republice: Neúčastníci a jejich sociální světy</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Lifelong Education
ISSN
0260-1370
e-ISSN
1464-519X
Svazek periodika
41
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
"277–293"
Kód UT WoS článku
000778927400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85129214000