"We beg you not to equate the names of Gypsies and knife-grinders with honest traders." Itinerant Trade and the Racialisation of "Gypsies" in the Czech Lands between 1918 and 1938

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F19%3A10395900" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/19:10395900 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yiWv_clIi3" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yiWv_clIi3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23777/SN0219/ART_PBAL01" target="_blank" >10.23777/SN0219/ART_PBAL01</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

"We beg you not to equate the names of Gypsies and knife-grinders with honest traders." Itinerant Trade and the Racialisation of "Gypsies" in the Czech Lands between 1918 and 1938

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article focuses on the contemporary common association of itinerant trades with &quot;Gypsyness&quot; and the consequent relation between adopting anti-Gypsy measures and the state intentions to regulate professing itinerant trades. By analysing the intended bill on itinerant trades, the study shows how were the administrative police terms such as Gypsies and &quot;work-shies&quot; intertwined. It, further, argues that limiting space for self-employed mobile economic activities went hand in hand with legalizing the status of second-class citizens in 1927 when a new law On Wandering Gypsies was passed by the Czechoslovak Parliament. The article also analyses the agency of one particular itinerant traders&apos; association called Kotva (Anchor) and pays the attention to the traders&apos; manifold defensive strategies. Because of their close contacts with Gypsies - sharing social and economic spaces -, setting themselves apart from the Gypsies and presenting themselves as &quot;decent citizens&quot;, i.e. part of the Czechoslovak nation, constituted crucial agenda of this association. In their successful effort to shield themselves of being included into the new police register of &quot;wandering Gypsies&quot; they reproduced and amplified the state aim to eliminate &quot;work-shies&quot; among itinerant traders. In this way, the article deals with the process of racialization of the category of Gypsies in the interwar Czechoslovakia. And racialization is presented as intricate historical process which was influenced even by the non-state historical actors.

Název v anglickém jazyce

"We beg you not to equate the names of Gypsies and knife-grinders with honest traders." Itinerant Trade and the Racialisation of "Gypsies" in the Czech Lands between 1918 and 1938

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article focuses on the contemporary common association of itinerant trades with &quot;Gypsyness&quot; and the consequent relation between adopting anti-Gypsy measures and the state intentions to regulate professing itinerant trades. By analysing the intended bill on itinerant trades, the study shows how were the administrative police terms such as Gypsies and &quot;work-shies&quot; intertwined. It, further, argues that limiting space for self-employed mobile economic activities went hand in hand with legalizing the status of second-class citizens in 1927 when a new law On Wandering Gypsies was passed by the Czechoslovak Parliament. The article also analyses the agency of one particular itinerant traders&apos; association called Kotva (Anchor) and pays the attention to the traders&apos; manifold defensive strategies. Because of their close contacts with Gypsies - sharing social and economic spaces -, setting themselves apart from the Gypsies and presenting themselves as &quot;decent citizens&quot;, i.e. part of the Czechoslovak nation, constituted crucial agenda of this association. In their successful effort to shield themselves of being included into the new police register of &quot;wandering Gypsies&quot; they reproduced and amplified the state aim to eliminate &quot;work-shies&quot; among itinerant traders. In this way, the article deals with the process of racialization of the category of Gypsies in the interwar Czechoslovakia. And racialization is presented as intricate historical process which was influenced even by the non-state historical actors.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

S:I.M.O.N. Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation.

ISSN

2408-9192

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

AT - Rakouská republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

44-54

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—