<i>No biggie</i> can be a “biggie”: A taxonomical and statistical analysis of the pragmaticalization of <i>no biggie</i> on the basis of pragma-syntactic variation and co-occurring lexical items
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3AQM95NBJ3" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:QM95NBJ3 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001899" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001899</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.10.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.pragma.2024.10.003</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
<i>No biggie</i> can be a “biggie”: A taxonomical and statistical analysis of the pragmaticalization of <i>no biggie</i> on the basis of pragma-syntactic variation and co-occurring lexical items
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study seeks to explore the pragmaticalization process of (it's) no biggie, through a corpus-based taxonomical and statistical examination. The research study involves (i) elaborating a taxonomy of no biggie constructions by exploring the variability of the pragmatic functions and the syntactic features associated with the construction; (ii) monitoring the links between the taxonomical types of no biggie and the parameters of syntactic loci and structure of the construction (e.g. absence of it's); and (iii) determining habitual lexical items that co-occur with the construction. The findings show that the vast majority of (it's) no biggie constructions are used in its abbreviated form no biggie, half of which being employed as a discourse-pragmatic marker (DPM). The correlations between syntactic loci and the taxonomy were tested through Chi-square, which demonstrates that specific pragma–syntactic properties are orderly assigned to extended forms, and that pragmaticalized free-standing constructions (as with DPMs) are generally used in the middle of a clause. The analysis of no biggie collocates also indicates that the pragma-syntactic function of the collocates is oftentimes subject to the syntactic function of the construction types. Finally, a qualitative examination of the taxonomy and their examples confirms that pragma-syntactic variation occurs differently in all the taxonomical types, the DPM no biggie showing the highest degree of variation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
<i>No biggie</i> can be a “biggie”: A taxonomical and statistical analysis of the pragmaticalization of <i>no biggie</i> on the basis of pragma-syntactic variation and co-occurring lexical items
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study seeks to explore the pragmaticalization process of (it's) no biggie, through a corpus-based taxonomical and statistical examination. The research study involves (i) elaborating a taxonomy of no biggie constructions by exploring the variability of the pragmatic functions and the syntactic features associated with the construction; (ii) monitoring the links between the taxonomical types of no biggie and the parameters of syntactic loci and structure of the construction (e.g. absence of it's); and (iii) determining habitual lexical items that co-occur with the construction. The findings show that the vast majority of (it's) no biggie constructions are used in its abbreviated form no biggie, half of which being employed as a discourse-pragmatic marker (DPM). The correlations between syntactic loci and the taxonomy were tested through Chi-square, which demonstrates that specific pragma–syntactic properties are orderly assigned to extended forms, and that pragmaticalized free-standing constructions (as with DPMs) are generally used in the middle of a clause. The analysis of no biggie collocates also indicates that the pragma-syntactic function of the collocates is oftentimes subject to the syntactic function of the construction types. Finally, a qualitative examination of the taxonomy and their examples confirms that pragma-syntactic variation occurs differently in all the taxonomical types, the DPM no biggie showing the highest degree of variation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Pragmatics
ISSN
0378-2166
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
234
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2024-12-01
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
1-15
Kód UT WoS článku
001348731200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—