When PISA does not matter? The Case of Czech Republic and Germany

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F12%3A10124109" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/12:10124109 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/55rl4j1k74g6ht1w/" target="_blank" >http://www.springerlink.com/content/55rl4j1k74g6ht1w/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0004-5" target="_blank" >10.2478/s13374-012-0004-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

When PISA does not matter? The Case of Czech Republic and Germany

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The present paper gives an overview of the reflections of and reactions to publishing the results of the first wave of the OECD study Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in the Czech Republic and in Germany. The choice of these two countries enables us to document how the same results could be perceived very differently in diverse country contexts and could lead to a different reaction from policy-makers. In spite of large reforms and numerous policy measures being adopted in Germany in reaction to the PISA results, compared with no response from policy-makers in the Czech Republic, it is argued, that in both countries policy-makers failed to tackle the major problem of their educational systems-its selective nature. In the final section we discuss various mis(uses) of PISA and its supranational and global character influencing local policies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

When PISA does not matter? The Case of Czech Republic and Germany

Popis výsledku anglicky

The present paper gives an overview of the reflections of and reactions to publishing the results of the first wave of the OECD study Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in the Czech Republic and in Germany. The choice of these two countries enables us to document how the same results could be perceived very differently in diverse country contexts and could lead to a different reaction from policy-makers. In spite of large reforms and numerous policy measures being adopted in Germany in reaction to the PISA results, compared with no response from policy-makers in the Czech Republic, it is argued, that in both countries policy-makers failed to tackle the major problem of their educational systems-its selective nature. In the final section we discuss various mis(uses) of PISA and its supranational and global character influencing local policies.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AM - Pedagogika a školství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP407%2F11%2F1556" target="_blank" >GAP407/11/1556: Nerovné podmínky škol – nerovné šance žáků: Zkoumání vztahu mezi kvalitou učitelů, klimatem školy, výsledky žáků a jejich sociálním původem</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Human Affairs

ISSN

1210-3055

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

31-42

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—