Deictic motion verbs and anchoring the direction of motion in Estonian, Finnish and Czech

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A90244%2F24%3A10495936" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:90244/24:10495936 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14210/24:00137660

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=bmrp8IPFhB" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=bmrp8IPFhB</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/LV34.01" target="_blank" >10.5128/LV34.01</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Deictic motion verbs and anchoring the direction of motion in Estonian, Finnish and Czech

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this paper is to contrast Estonian and Finnish deictic motion verbs (minema/mennä, tulema/tulla, viima/viedä, tooma/tuoda) with descriptions of the same motion situations in Czech, which does not have similar pairs of deictic motion verbs. The paper first describes Estonian and Finnish deictic motion verbs according to the literature and provides a short overview of motion verbs in Czech. The analysis is based on examples selected from two literary texts, one Estonian and one Finnish, and their translations. The comparison concentrates on different means of anchoring the direction of motion, that is, which part of the motion scene is selected as the landmark for translational motion. The paper shows that though Czech verb prefixes can in effect anchor the direction of motion to the speaker or to a location known to the speaker and addressee, the function of these prefixes is not directly comparable with the pairs of deictic motion verbs in Finnish and Estonian.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Deictic motion verbs and anchoring the direction of motion in Estonian, Finnish and Czech

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this paper is to contrast Estonian and Finnish deictic motion verbs (minema/mennä, tulema/tulla, viima/viedä, tooma/tuoda) with descriptions of the same motion situations in Czech, which does not have similar pairs of deictic motion verbs. The paper first describes Estonian and Finnish deictic motion verbs according to the literature and provides a short overview of motion verbs in Czech. The analysis is based on examples selected from two literary texts, one Estonian and one Finnish, and their translations. The comparison concentrates on different means of anchoring the direction of motion, that is, which part of the motion scene is selected as the landmark for translational motion. The paper shows that though Czech verb prefixes can in effect anchor the direction of motion to the speaker or to a location known to the speaker and addressee, the function of these prefixes is not directly comparable with the pairs of deictic motion verbs in Finnish and Estonian.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Lähivõrdlusi

ISSN

1736-9290

e-ISSN

2228-3854

Svazek periodika

34

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

EE - Estonská republika

Počet stran výsledku

34

Strana od-do

15-48

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85210001633