Reconstruction of Metaphors in Argumentation : a Case Study of Lincoln´s Metaphor of ?Swapping Horses While Crossing a Stream?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F14%3A00079593" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/14:00079593 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reconstruction of Metaphors in Argumentation : a Case Study of Lincoln´s Metaphor of ?Swapping Horses While Crossing a Stream?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper deals with the possibilities of reconstruction of metaphors as a means of argumentation provided by pragma-dialectics. In the case of Lincoln´s famous statement, in which he uses the metaphor of ?swapping horses while crossing a stream? for replacing the President, two methods of the reconstruction currently under consideration are first introduced: metaphor as an argument by analogy in the ?standard? model of pragma-dialectics and as a presentation device in pragma-dialectics extended by theconcept of strategic maneuvering. Then, a competing reconstruction of Lincoln´s metaphors in the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) is presented, which is based on the development of the pragma-dialectical concept of material and procedural starting-points. Lincoln´s argument is reconstructed as a complex argument, where the metaphor figures as a sub-argument using locus from analogy that is used to support a datum in the main branch of the argument.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reconstruction of Metaphors in Argumentation : a Case Study of Lincoln´s Metaphor of ?Swapping Horses While Crossing a Stream?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper deals with the possibilities of reconstruction of metaphors as a means of argumentation provided by pragma-dialectics. In the case of Lincoln´s famous statement, in which he uses the metaphor of ?swapping horses while crossing a stream? for replacing the President, two methods of the reconstruction currently under consideration are first introduced: metaphor as an argument by analogy in the ?standard? model of pragma-dialectics and as a presentation device in pragma-dialectics extended by theconcept of strategic maneuvering. Then, a competing reconstruction of Lincoln´s metaphors in the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) is presented, which is based on the development of the pragma-dialectical concept of material and procedural starting-points. Lincoln´s argument is reconstructed as a complex argument, where the metaphor figures as a sub-argument using locus from analogy that is used to support a datum in the main branch of the argument.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation

ISSN

0718-8285

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CL - Chilská republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

67-89

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—