Reporting verbs as indicators of stance in academic discourse
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F08%3A00034470" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/08:00034470 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Reporting verbs as indicators of stance in academic discourse
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Academic discourse is now generally seen as a purposeful interaction between writers and readers in which the writers try to construct a coherent and credible representation of themselves and their research and to negotiate their relationship with the discourse community by referring to the work of others and by evaluating their views. Previous studies on citation practices in academic writing have concentrated on showing differences in the preferences of academic communities by discipline. This contribution tries to examine the differences in the citation practices in academic English on the basis of an analysis of unpublished undergraduate and graduate theses, while discussing the differences in the choice of reporting verbs as means for expressing evaluation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Reporting verbs as indicators of stance in academic discourse
Popis výsledku anglicky
Academic discourse is now generally seen as a purposeful interaction between writers and readers in which the writers try to construct a coherent and credible representation of themselves and their research and to negotiate their relationship with the discourse community by referring to the work of others and by evaluating their views. Previous studies on citation practices in academic writing have concentrated on showing differences in the preferences of academic communities by discipline. This contribution tries to examine the differences in the citation practices in academic English on the basis of an analysis of unpublished undergraduate and graduate theses, while discussing the differences in the choice of reporting verbs as means for expressing evaluation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AI - Jazykověda
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2008
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Porta Lingea-2008. Szakember, szaktudás, szakuyelv.
ISSN
1785-2420
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2008
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
HU - Maďarsko
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—