Computer or Paper? A Comparison of Two Modes of Test Administration

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F23%3A00131793" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/23:00131793 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/book/2249" target="_blank" >https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/book/2249</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M280-0292-2023" target="_blank" >10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M280-0292-2023</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Computer or Paper? A Comparison of Two Modes of Test Administration

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The text compares first year university students’ compulsory English achievement tests written in two modes of administration, i.e. pencil and paper and computer-based tests (PPT and CBT). The central research question investigated is whether the usage of computer-based language testing is justified in such a context. It first maps the theoretical discourse and comments on selected fundamental aspects of language testing practices, significant for the comparison itself. A mixed methods design is employed, where quantitative test data is used to measure the equivalency of the two modes and qualitative self-report feedback form data explores the main advantages and disadvantages of these, as viewed by the students examined.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Computer or Paper? A Comparison of Two Modes of Test Administration

Popis výsledku anglicky

The text compares first year university students’ compulsory English achievement tests written in two modes of administration, i.e. pencil and paper and computer-based tests (PPT and CBT). The central research question investigated is whether the usage of computer-based language testing is justified in such a context. It first maps the theoretical discourse and comments on selected fundamental aspects of language testing practices, significant for the comparison itself. A mixed methods design is employed, where quantitative test data is used to measure the equivalency of the two modes and qualitative self-report feedback form data explores the main advantages and disadvantages of these, as viewed by the students examined.

Druh

B - Odborná kniha

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

ISBN

9788028002916

Počet stran knihy

175

Název nakladatele

Masaryk University Press

Místo vydání

Brno

Kód UT WoS knihy

—