Possibilities of trolleybus transportation energy demand reduction
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F15%3APU117247" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/15:PU117247 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/07001.0301ecst" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/07001.0301ecst</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/07001.0301ecst" target="_blank" >10.1149/07001.0301ecst</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Possibilities of trolleybus transportation energy demand reduction
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper presents measurement results of energy balance of trolleybus regenerative braking in Brno office of public transportation. Energy storage tank (ultracapacitor or LiFePO4 battery) can be used for utilization of braking energy. Further the possibility to drive without trolley can be very useful for the office of public transportation. In this case the energy storage tank must be paced directly in the vehicle, not in the substation. Detailed measurements were performed in real trolleybus traffic on several representative routes at various work shifts. The energy balance was evaluated from the measured data. Then the energy storage tank was dimensioned (energy and power) considering both variants – ultracapacitor or LiFePO4 batteries. The results were compared each other technically and economically. Considering the ability of independent drive without trolley the solution with LiFePO4 battery is more advantageous than with the ultracapacitor.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Possibilities of trolleybus transportation energy demand reduction
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper presents measurement results of energy balance of trolleybus regenerative braking in Brno office of public transportation. Energy storage tank (ultracapacitor or LiFePO4 battery) can be used for utilization of braking energy. Further the possibility to drive without trolley can be very useful for the office of public transportation. In this case the energy storage tank must be paced directly in the vehicle, not in the substation. Detailed measurements were performed in real trolleybus traffic on several representative routes at various work shifts. The energy balance was evaluated from the measured data. Then the energy storage tank was dimensioned (energy and power) considering both variants – ultracapacitor or LiFePO4 batteries. The results were compared each other technically and economically. Considering the ability of independent drive without trolley the solution with LiFePO4 battery is more advantageous than with the ultracapacitor.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1210" target="_blank" >LO1210: Energie v podmínkách udržitelného rozvoje (EN-PUR)</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
ECS Transactions
ISSN
1938-5862
e-ISSN
1938-6737
Svazek periodika
70
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
301-304
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84957033338