Evaluation of Czech hop varieties in beer
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F14864347%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000010" target="_blank" >RIV/14864347:_____/21:N0000010 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://kvasnyprumysl.eu/index.php/kp/article/view/255" target="_blank" >https://kvasnyprumysl.eu/index.php/kp/article/view/255</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18832/kp2021.67.529" target="_blank" >10.18832/kp2021.67.529</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Evaluation of Czech hop varieties in beer
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
New hop varieties were evaluated in brewing tests in the years 2020 and 2021. The Saaz Comfort, Saaz Shine, Saaz Late and Saaz fine aroma hops were compared in lager style beers. Saaz Comfort has the best evaluation in terms of overall popularity. With a 95% probability, its evaluation is different from that of Saaz Shine. Saaz Comfort has a considerably different evaluation of bitterness than Saaz Late and Saaz Shine. The results show that fine aroma hop varieties have different characteristics and thus do not compete with each other. Kazbek and Cascade were compared in lager and ale beer styles. No significant difference was determined in the lager style. However, a significant difference between Kazbek and Cascade was established in ale. Gaia has a considerably better evaluation in the lager style than in ale. Gaia has the best evaluation of aroma and bitterness in lagers with dry hopping.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Evaluation of Czech hop varieties in beer
Popis výsledku anglicky
New hop varieties were evaluated in brewing tests in the years 2020 and 2021. The Saaz Comfort, Saaz Shine, Saaz Late and Saaz fine aroma hops were compared in lager style beers. Saaz Comfort has the best evaluation in terms of overall popularity. With a 95% probability, its evaluation is different from that of Saaz Shine. Saaz Comfort has a considerably different evaluation of bitterness than Saaz Late and Saaz Shine. The results show that fine aroma hop varieties have different characteristics and thus do not compete with each other. Kazbek and Cascade were compared in lager and ale beer styles. No significant difference was determined in the lager style. However, a significant difference between Kazbek and Cascade was established in ale. Gaia has a considerably better evaluation in the lager style than in ale. Gaia has the best evaluation of aroma and bitterness in lagers with dry hopping.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/QK21010136" target="_blank" >QK21010136: Aplikace nových odrůd a genotypů chmele odolných k suchu do pěstitelské a pivovarské praxe</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Kvasný průmysl
ISSN
2570-8619
e-ISSN
2570-8619
Svazek periodika
67
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
529-536
Kód UT WoS článku
000750982800002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—