Image as an important part of the quality evaluation of a faculty
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F19%3A43894645" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/19:43894645 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Image as an important part of the quality evaluation of a faculty
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The image of a faculty has an impact on its prosperity and success, hence attention should be given to these issues. The objective of this study is to identify whether there are differences in the evaluation of the image of a faculty across groups of students in full-time and part-time study as well as alumni of the faculty. The evaluation of the image was established using a semantic differential. The data were evaluated using Friedman's ANOVA and Kendall Coeff. of Concordance and the Kruskal-Wallis test. It was established that the evaluation of the groups show statistically significant differences. Full-time students gave the strictest evaluation. Only one item (of a total of 11 questions) showed concordance among the groups in the evaluation - faculty friendliness. The total evaluation of the faculty image was good. Both strong points and areas the faculty can focus on in the future were identified.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Image as an important part of the quality evaluation of a faculty
Popis výsledku anglicky
The image of a faculty has an impact on its prosperity and success, hence attention should be given to these issues. The objective of this study is to identify whether there are differences in the evaluation of the image of a faculty across groups of students in full-time and part-time study as well as alumni of the faculty. The evaluation of the image was established using a semantic differential. The data were evaluated using Friedman's ANOVA and Kendall Coeff. of Concordance and the Kruskal-Wallis test. It was established that the evaluation of the groups show statistically significant differences. Full-time students gave the strictest evaluation. Only one item (of a total of 11 questions) showed concordance among the groups in the evaluation - faculty friendliness. The total evaluation of the faculty image was good. Both strong points and areas the faculty can focus on in the future were identified.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50204 - Business and management
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
ERIE2019 Conference Proceedings
ISBN
978-80-213-2878-5
ISSN
2336-744X
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
283-289
Název nakladatele
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Místo vydání
Praha
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
6. 6. 2019
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000478861500037