Ranking alternatives by pairwise comparisons matrix and priority vector

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F17%3A00010973" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/17:00010973 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0040" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0040</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0040" target="_blank" >10.1515/saeb-2017-0040</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ranking alternatives by pairwise comparisons matrix and priority vector

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The decision making problem considered here is to rank n alternatives from the best to the worst, using information given by the decision maker-s in the form of an n×n pairwise comparisons /PC/ matrix. We investigate pairwise comparisons matrices with elements from a real interval which is a traditional multiplicative approach used in Analytic hierarchy process /AHP/. Here, we deal with two essential elements of AHP measuring consistency of PC matrix and the method of eliciting the priority vector by which the final ranking of alternatives is derived. Classical approaches introduced by T. Saaty in AHP are compared with later approaches based on the AHP criticism published in the literature. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are highlighted and discussed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ranking alternatives by pairwise comparisons matrix and priority vector

Popis výsledku anglicky

The decision making problem considered here is to rank n alternatives from the best to the worst, using information given by the decision maker-s in the form of an n×n pairwise comparisons /PC/ matrix. We investigate pairwise comparisons matrices with elements from a real interval which is a traditional multiplicative approach used in Analytic hierarchy process /AHP/. Here, we deal with two essential elements of AHP measuring consistency of PC matrix and the method of eliciting the priority vector by which the final ranking of alternatives is derived. Classical approaches introduced by T. Saaty in AHP are compared with later approaches based on the AHP criticism published in the literature. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are highlighted and discussed.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10103 - Statistics and probability

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Scientific Annals of Economics and Business

ISSN

2501-1960

e-ISSN

2501-3165

Svazek periodika

2017

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

64

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

85-95

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041132250