Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F14%3A43922703" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23520/14:43922703 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06496" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06496</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06496" target="_blank" >10.1038/srep06496</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Modern bibliographic databases provide the basis for scientific research and its evaluation. While their content and structure differ substantially, there exist only informal notions on their reliability. Here we compare the topological consistency of citation networks extracted from six popular bibliographic databases including Web of Science, CiteSeer and arXiv.org. The networks are assessed through a rich set of local and global graph statistics. We first reveal statistically significant inconsistencies between some of the databases with respect to individual statistics. For example, the introduced field bow-tie decomposition of DBLP Computer Science Bibliography substantially differs from the rest due to the coverage of the database, while the citation information within arXiv.org is the most exhaustive. Finally, we compare the databases over multiple graph statistics using the critical difference diagram. The citation topology of DBLP Computer Science Bibliography is the least con

Název v anglickém jazyce

Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases

Popis výsledku anglicky

Modern bibliographic databases provide the basis for scientific research and its evaluation. While their content and structure differ substantially, there exist only informal notions on their reliability. Here we compare the topological consistency of citation networks extracted from six popular bibliographic databases including Web of Science, CiteSeer and arXiv.org. The networks are assessed through a rich set of local and global graph statistics. We first reveal statistically significant inconsistencies between some of the databases with respect to individual statistics. For example, the introduced field bow-tie decomposition of DBLP Computer Science Bibliography substantially differs from the rest due to the coverage of the database, while the citation information within arXiv.org is the most exhaustive. Finally, we compare the databases over multiple graph statistics using the critical difference diagram. The citation topology of DBLP Computer Science Bibliography is the least con

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

IN - Informatika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0090" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0090: NTIS - Nové technologie pro informační společnost</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Scientifc Reports

ISSN

2045-2322

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6496

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1-10

Kód UT WoS článku

000342363200004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—