A JOINT ASSESSMENT OF REASONING ABOUT GENERAL STATEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS AND BIOLOGY
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12410%2F21%3A43904311" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12410/21:43904311 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/62690094:18470/21:50018982
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/article/view/557" target="_blank" >https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/article/view/557</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2021.140406" target="_blank" >10.7160/eriesj.2021.140406</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A JOINT ASSESSMENT OF REASONING ABOUT GENERAL STATEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS AND BIOLOGY
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This contribution belongs to a larger empirical study that focuses on issues related to the implementation of inquiry-based learning and formative assessment in science and mathematics education, while it also refers to the issue of STEM education. Here, we discuss the two topics from the perspective of professional preparation of primary school teachers. We employ an educational tool called Concept Cartoons and perceive it as a common diagnostic tool for investigating modes of reasoning about general statements in arithmetic, geometry and biology. The presented qualitative exploratory empirical study maps and codes various kinds of reasoning that can be identified with the tool and investigates possibilities of a joint coding procedure. As a result, it provides a conversion table between various modes of reasoning in the three subject domains. The arisen code categories cover the field of generic examples, including the initial stages so that they can be used for scaffolding the process of learning the foundations of deductive reasoning. The joint approach to reasoning in mathematics and biology shows how argumentation and formative assessment can be understood equally and developed simultaneously in both school subjects. It helps us to see how the two school subjects can be integrated didactically.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A JOINT ASSESSMENT OF REASONING ABOUT GENERAL STATEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS AND BIOLOGY
Popis výsledku anglicky
This contribution belongs to a larger empirical study that focuses on issues related to the implementation of inquiry-based learning and formative assessment in science and mathematics education, while it also refers to the issue of STEM education. Here, we discuss the two topics from the perspective of professional preparation of primary school teachers. We employ an educational tool called Concept Cartoons and perceive it as a common diagnostic tool for investigating modes of reasoning about general statements in arithmetic, geometry and biology. The presented qualitative exploratory empirical study maps and codes various kinds of reasoning that can be identified with the tool and investigates possibilities of a joint coding procedure. As a result, it provides a conversion table between various modes of reasoning in the three subject domains. The arisen code categories cover the field of generic examples, including the initial stages so that they can be used for scaffolding the process of learning the foundations of deductive reasoning. The joint approach to reasoning in mathematics and biology shows how argumentation and formative assessment can be understood equally and developed simultaneously in both school subjects. It helps us to see how the two school subjects can be integrated didactically.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/TL02000368" target="_blank" >TL02000368: Hyperspace pro formativní hodnocení a badatelsky orientovanou výuku v přírodovědných předmětech a matematice</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science
ISSN
2336-2375
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
270-287
Kód UT WoS článku
000744194500007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85125877156