Quantitative Differences among Normal and Knowledge Texts on Agriculture Waste Processing
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F14%3A65603" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/14:65603 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Quantitative Differences among Normal and Knowledge Texts on Agriculture Waste Processing
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The objective of this work is to identify the differences among educational texts written in two styles: normal educational text and their knowledge form. The research sample consists of 60 documents ? educational texts on agriculture waste processing ?converted by the authors into the knowledge form. Over the set of indicators used for evaluating the educational texts, we formulated working and operational hypotheses and validated them using the paired sample t-test. The results show that the complextext difficulty rate of knowledge texts is significantly (a = 0.05) lower than of the normal texts. They present the same amount of information logically divided into more simple sentences merged to complex sentences. Based on the difference in frequencies of selected identifiers we are able to distinguish the literary styles. The further research aims at an automatic recognition of the text styles and measuring the amount of knowledge inside the text.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Quantitative Differences among Normal and Knowledge Texts on Agriculture Waste Processing
Popis výsledku anglicky
The objective of this work is to identify the differences among educational texts written in two styles: normal educational text and their knowledge form. The research sample consists of 60 documents ? educational texts on agriculture waste processing ?converted by the authors into the knowledge form. Over the set of indicators used for evaluating the educational texts, we formulated working and operational hypotheses and validated them using the paired sample t-test. The results show that the complextext difficulty rate of knowledge texts is significantly (a = 0.05) lower than of the normal texts. They present the same amount of information logically divided into more simple sentences merged to complex sentences. Based on the difference in frequencies of selected identifiers we are able to distinguish the literary styles. The further research aims at an automatic recognition of the text styles and measuring the amount of knowledge inside the text.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
BB - Aplikovaná statistika, operační výzkum
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics
ISSN
1804-1930
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
VI
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
59-68
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—