Anatomical theatre or full digitisation? Students’ preferences in field of anatomy teaching

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F25%3AA2603DN9" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/25:A2603DN9 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.viamedica.pl/folia_morphologica/article/view/101602" target="_blank" >https://journals.viamedica.pl/folia_morphologica/article/view/101602</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/fm.101602" target="_blank" >10.5603/fm.101602</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Anatomical theatre or full digitisation? Students’ preferences in field of anatomy teaching

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: For many years, the teaching of anatomy has been based on traditional forms of imparting knowledge, but innovative solutions are currently being implemented on a large scale around the world. The COVID-19 pandemic and distanced learning have influenced the development of new technologies in teaching. Materials and methods: This study was conducted among medical students who studied anatomy in the year preceding the analysis when the restrictions related to the pandemic had been lifted. The questionnaire contained 10 questions with YES/NO answers and a modified 10-point Likert scale. The data was subjected to statistical analysis performed in R studio using the R programming language. 650 respondents were included in the analysis. Results: Students assessed the modernisation of anatomy departments to be unsatisfactory; on a 10-point scale, the most common answer was 2, and the average was 2.69. At the same time, they assessed the accessibility of knowledge to be acceptable - median 6, with an average of 5.58. 75.38% of respondents did not use virtual reality technology, 75.69% did not use a 3D printer, and 92.5% did not work with a virtual anatomical table. The vast majority ofstudents claimed that new technologies will be useful in their future clinical practice. Conclusions: New technologies are still too rarely used in the teaching of anatomy, despite the increasing availability of such solutions and consensus among students as to the validity of implementing innovations in their future clinical practice. It seems reasonable to enable cooperation between traditional and modern forms of learning. (Folia Morphol 2025; 84, 2: 463-470)

Název v anglickém jazyce

Anatomical theatre or full digitisation? Students’ preferences in field of anatomy teaching

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: For many years, the teaching of anatomy has been based on traditional forms of imparting knowledge, but innovative solutions are currently being implemented on a large scale around the world. The COVID-19 pandemic and distanced learning have influenced the development of new technologies in teaching. Materials and methods: This study was conducted among medical students who studied anatomy in the year preceding the analysis when the restrictions related to the pandemic had been lifted. The questionnaire contained 10 questions with YES/NO answers and a modified 10-point Likert scale. The data was subjected to statistical analysis performed in R studio using the R programming language. 650 respondents were included in the analysis. Results: Students assessed the modernisation of anatomy departments to be unsatisfactory; on a 10-point scale, the most common answer was 2, and the average was 2.69. At the same time, they assessed the accessibility of knowledge to be acceptable - median 6, with an average of 5.58. 75.38% of respondents did not use virtual reality technology, 75.69% did not use a 3D printer, and 92.5% did not work with a virtual anatomical table. The vast majority ofstudents claimed that new technologies will be useful in their future clinical practice. Conclusions: New technologies are still too rarely used in the teaching of anatomy, despite the increasing availability of such solutions and consensus among students as to the validity of implementing innovations in their future clinical practice. It seems reasonable to enable cooperation between traditional and modern forms of learning. (Folia Morphol 2025; 84, 2: 463-470)

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30106 - Anatomy and morphology (plant science to be 1.6)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Folia Morphologica

ISSN

0015-5659

e-ISSN

1644-3284

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

463-470

Kód UT WoS článku

001598414200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105010101642