Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Analysis of the Level and Form of Formative Assessment in Online Classes of the Primary and Lower Secondary School in the Czech Republic

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F21%3A73611260" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/21:73611260 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://library.iated.org/view/SUCHANEK2021ANA" target="_blank" >https://library.iated.org/view/SUCHANEK2021ANA</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2021.1401" target="_blank" >10.21125/iceri.2021.1401</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Analysis of the Level and Form of Formative Assessment in Online Classes of the Primary and Lower Secondary School in the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The current form of formative assessment in Czech primary and lower secondary schools is facing criticism. This is evidenced by the reports of the Czech School Inspectorate and some research findings of the authors. Despite the proven benefits of formative assessment not only abroad, teachers in Czech primary and lower secondary schools, according to current research, still prefer summative assessment. There is not much evidence of the current form of formative assessment in Czech schools, because only a small amount of research deals with the issue of formative assessment. Furthermore, formative assessment has not yet been properly grasped in the national curricula. However, the general assumption is that teachers do work with formative assessment, but it has not yet been revealed in what form and extent. The article and the research present the results of the analysis of ten online lessons at primary and lower secondary school within the educational area of Language and Communication through Language. The analysis was performed using assessment areas based on the concept of formative assessment by McMillan. This concept was adjusted and edited by the authors of this paper to be based on the current educational reality of Czech primary and lower secondary schools. The assessment areas work with three levels of formative assessment which can reveal the final form of formative assessment in teaching. The main goal is to present the assessment areas and the results of 10 analyzed online lessons. Online lessons were recorded, and their results were thoroughly analyzed by two observers. We monitored the degree of consensus between the two observers. It was found that the teaching of primary and lower secondary school teachers reflects a low level of formative assessment with a slight overlap to a moderate level. The results of this study thus confirm the current criticism of schools that primary and lower secondary school teachers rather prefer summative assessment. The results will serve the primary and lower secondary school in the effective implementation of formative assessment in teaching practice (the goal is to achieve a higher level of formative assessment). The results can also be of value to the researchers who deal with the issue of implementing formative assessment into a teaching practice.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Analysis of the Level and Form of Formative Assessment in Online Classes of the Primary and Lower Secondary School in the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The current form of formative assessment in Czech primary and lower secondary schools is facing criticism. This is evidenced by the reports of the Czech School Inspectorate and some research findings of the authors. Despite the proven benefits of formative assessment not only abroad, teachers in Czech primary and lower secondary schools, according to current research, still prefer summative assessment. There is not much evidence of the current form of formative assessment in Czech schools, because only a small amount of research deals with the issue of formative assessment. Furthermore, formative assessment has not yet been properly grasped in the national curricula. However, the general assumption is that teachers do work with formative assessment, but it has not yet been revealed in what form and extent. The article and the research present the results of the analysis of ten online lessons at primary and lower secondary school within the educational area of Language and Communication through Language. The analysis was performed using assessment areas based on the concept of formative assessment by McMillan. This concept was adjusted and edited by the authors of this paper to be based on the current educational reality of Czech primary and lower secondary schools. The assessment areas work with three levels of formative assessment which can reveal the final form of formative assessment in teaching. The main goal is to present the assessment areas and the results of 10 analyzed online lessons. Online lessons were recorded, and their results were thoroughly analyzed by two observers. We monitored the degree of consensus between the two observers. It was found that the teaching of primary and lower secondary school teachers reflects a low level of formative assessment with a slight overlap to a moderate level. The results of this study thus confirm the current criticism of schools that primary and lower secondary school teachers rather prefer summative assessment. The results will serve the primary and lower secondary school in the effective implementation of formative assessment in teaching practice (the goal is to achieve a higher level of formative assessment). The results can also be of value to the researchers who deal with the issue of implementing formative assessment into a teaching practice.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    ICERI2021 Proceedings

  • ISBN

    978-84-09-34549-6

  • ISSN

    2340-1095

  • e-ISSN

    2340-1095

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    6211-6218

  • Název nakladatele

    International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED)

  • Místo vydání

    Madrid

  • Místo konání akce

    Sevilla

  • Datum konání akce

    8. 11. 2021

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku