Porovnání metod pro identifikaci patogenních sérotypů a biotypů Yersinia enterocolitica : Mikrobiologické metody a PCR

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16270%2F06%3A00000874" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16270/06:00000874 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this study, pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica were identified by microbiological and PCR methods. The samples were collected from pigs, cattle, poultry, and slaughter houses. Three common techniques were used to isolate Y. enterocolitica from the samples - ITC, PSB, and direct on the CIN. Primers A1/A2, Y1/Y2, and rfbC 1/rfbC 2 were used for the specific detection of the pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica. Traditional microbiological methods were found to be insufficient for the specific identification of the Y. enterocolitica pathogen. In comparison with PCR which was able to detect 149 strains, the biochemical test could detect only 138 species. These results show that the use of biochemical methods of cultivation did not allow the identification of all Y. enterocolitica pathogens. In total, 149 strains of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica were examined of which 120 were from pigs, 19 from poultry, 8 were cattle strains, and 2 came from the environments of slaughterhouses.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this study, pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica were identified by microbiological and PCR methods. The samples were collected from pigs, cattle, poultry, and slaughter houses. Three common techniques were used to isolate Y. enterocolitica from the samples - ITC, PSB, and direct on the CIN. Primers A1/A2, Y1/Y2, and rfbC 1/rfbC 2 were used for the specific detection of the pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica. Traditional microbiological methods were found to be insufficient for the specific identification of the Y. enterocolitica pathogen. In comparison with PCR which was able to detect 149 strains, the biochemical test could detect only 138 species. These results show that the use of biochemical methods of cultivation did not allow the identification of all Y. enterocolitica pathogens. In total, 149 strains of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica were examined of which 120 were from pigs, 19 from poultry, 8 were cattle strains, and 2 came from the environments of slaughterhouses.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EE - Mikrobiologie, virologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2006

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Journal of Food Science

ISSN

1212-1800

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

217-222

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—