Comparison of new immunofluorescence method for detection of soy protein in meat products with immunohistochemical, histochemical, and ELISA methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16270%2F15%3A43873634" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16270/15:43873634 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2754/avb201483S10S65" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2754/avb201483S10S65</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2754/avb201483S10S65" target="_blank" >10.2754/avb201483S10S65</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of new immunofluorescence method for detection of soy protein in meat products with immunohistochemical, histochemical, and ELISA methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Soy proteins are commonly used in the food industry thanks to their technological properties. However, soya is, along with cow's milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, crustaceans, and mollusks, responsible for around 90% of food allergies, and isalso one of the foodstuff that can cause anaphylaxis. The aim of this work was to compare the immunofluorescence method for the detection of soy protein in meat products purchased from the retail market with other microscopic methods (immunohistochemicaland histochemical), with the ELISA reference method and with the confirmatory results. Within the research, 127 meat products purchased in the retail network were examined using the immunofluorescence method used for the detection of soy protein. The method was compared to Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA), immunohistochemical and histochemical methods. According to McNemar's test, non-compliance between the immunofluorescence method and immunohistochemical method was low. In ad

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of new immunofluorescence method for detection of soy protein in meat products with immunohistochemical, histochemical, and ELISA methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Soy proteins are commonly used in the food industry thanks to their technological properties. However, soya is, along with cow's milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, crustaceans, and mollusks, responsible for around 90% of food allergies, and isalso one of the foodstuff that can cause anaphylaxis. The aim of this work was to compare the immunofluorescence method for the detection of soy protein in meat products purchased from the retail market with other microscopic methods (immunohistochemicaland histochemical), with the ELISA reference method and with the confirmatory results. Within the research, 127 meat products purchased in the retail network were examined using the immunofluorescence method used for the detection of soy protein. The method was compared to Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA), immunohistochemical and histochemical methods. According to McNemar's test, non-compliance between the immunofluorescence method and immunohistochemical method was low. In ad

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

GM - Potravinářství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta veterinaria Brno

ISSN

0001-7213

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

83

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Suppl. 10

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

"S65"-"S69"

Kód UT WoS článku

000354505500011

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—