Flexible hybrid learning: Comparison of two approaches and learning results

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F16%3A50004934" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/16:50004934 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/ijicte.2016.5.issue-2/ijicte-2016-0007/ijicte-2016-0007.xml" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/ijicte.2016.5.issue-2/ijicte-2016-0007/ijicte-2016-0007.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijicte-2016-0007" target="_blank" >10.1515/ijicte-2016-0007</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Flexible hybrid learning: Comparison of two approaches and learning results

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Hybrid learning has become a widely exploited approach within the ICT-enhanced instruction. Making it flexible to students' individual needs and preferences was the problem solved in various ways at Czech higher education institutions. In the paper two approaches to adapting the learning process to learner's individual preferences are described comparing two different models of flexible hybrid learning. These models were exploited in educational practice and pedagogical experiments comparing learners' knowledge in flexible and non-flexible learning were conducted. The results did not proved clearly visible differences in the two approaches, as neither numerous world-recognized researches did. Despite this, authors are persuaded that research activities in this field should go on, paying deeper attention to learners' personal characteristics and other activities within the learning process.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Flexible hybrid learning: Comparison of two approaches and learning results

Popis výsledku anglicky

Hybrid learning has become a widely exploited approach within the ICT-enhanced instruction. Making it flexible to students' individual needs and preferences was the problem solved in various ways at Czech higher education institutions. In the paper two approaches to adapting the learning process to learner's individual preferences are described comparing two different models of flexible hybrid learning. These models were exploited in educational practice and pedagogical experiments comparing learners' knowledge in flexible and non-flexible learning were conducted. The results did not proved clearly visible differences in the two approaches, as neither numerous world-recognized researches did. Despite this, authors are persuaded that research activities in this field should go on, paying deeper attention to learners' personal characteristics and other activities within the learning process.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AM - Pedagogika a školství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International journal of information and communication technologies in education : ICTE journal

ISSN

1805-3726

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

29 - 50

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—