Pen&Paper, or e-Feedback: Comparative Study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F16%3A50004945" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/16:50004945 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_31" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_31</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_31" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_31</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Pen&Paper, or e-Feedback: Comparative Study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The main objective of this study is to research the process of providing individual written feedback to students' assignments written in the essay format within LMS. The feedback was made by the Pen&Paper method (i.e. handwriting) and by the ICT-enhanced method (i.e. typewriting, called e-feedback) in the English for Specific Purposes online course. The process was structured into three phases: (1) downloading the assignments from the online course, (2) writing the feedback and (3) uploading the assignments back to the online course in LMS. Both methods were identical in phases 1 and 3; however, the phase 2 differed. Totally 62 assignments were used for this research. Both the Pen&Paper method and e-feedback were applied on each assignment; and time periods spent on each assignment were measured and compared. Data were processed by the NCSS2010 statistic software. The results did not show any statistically significant differences in the total time periods.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Pen&Paper, or e-Feedback: Comparative Study
Popis výsledku anglicky
The main objective of this study is to research the process of providing individual written feedback to students' assignments written in the essay format within LMS. The feedback was made by the Pen&Paper method (i.e. handwriting) and by the ICT-enhanced method (i.e. typewriting, called e-feedback) in the English for Specific Purposes online course. The process was structured into three phases: (1) downloading the assignments from the online course, (2) writing the feedback and (3) uploading the assignments back to the online course in LMS. Both methods were identical in phases 1 and 3; however, the phase 2 differed. Totally 62 assignments were used for this research. Both the Pen&Paper method and e-feedback were applied on each assignment; and time periods spent on each assignment were measured and compared. Data were processed by the NCSS2010 statistic software. The results did not show any statistically significant differences in the total time periods.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AM - Pedagogika a školství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Lecture notes in computer science
ISBN
978-3-319-47439-7
ISSN
0302-9743
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
273-280
Název nakladatele
Springer
Místo vydání
Berlin
Místo konání akce
Řím, Itálie
Datum konání akce
26. 10. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—