Reading Legal Ethnographies to Re-Map Legal Pluralism: A Pospisilian Corrective to the Prevailing Dichotomous Description of Afghanistan’s Legal Order

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F23%3A50020414" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/23:50020414 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/27706869.2023.2213519?needAccess=true&role=button" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/27706869.2023.2213519?needAccess=true&role=button</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2213519" target="_blank" >10.1080/27706869.2023.2213519</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reading Legal Ethnographies to Re-Map Legal Pluralism: A Pospisilian Corrective to the Prevailing Dichotomous Description of Afghanistan’s Legal Order

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article explores several ethnographies (both academic and para-academic) of Afghanistan´s traditional justice (jirgas and shuras) in order to illuminate contrasts of their conceptual approaches at different periods of the country´s history. In this genealogy we identify ethnographic observations of the levels at which various sociolegal authorities operate and which often elude standard international ontology. The article takes the legal ethnographies as signposts for a conceptual reframing of the legal situation in the country by drawing upon Pospisil´s legal-anthropological conceptual approach which offers an alternative to generic global legal models based on binary oppositions such formal–informal, state–non-state or official–traditional. This reinterpretation achieves a more accurate non-dualistic understanding of Afghanistan’s traditional justice at the ethnographic micro-level. The discussion of Afghanistan´s legal ethnographies leads to renewed insights into Pospisil´s anthropological theory of law.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reading Legal Ethnographies to Re-Map Legal Pluralism: A Pospisilian Corrective to the Prevailing Dichotomous Description of Afghanistan’s Legal Order

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article explores several ethnographies (both academic and para-academic) of Afghanistan´s traditional justice (jirgas and shuras) in order to illuminate contrasts of their conceptual approaches at different periods of the country´s history. In this genealogy we identify ethnographic observations of the levels at which various sociolegal authorities operate and which often elude standard international ontology. The article takes the legal ethnographies as signposts for a conceptual reframing of the legal situation in the country by drawing upon Pospisil´s legal-anthropological conceptual approach which offers an alternative to generic global legal models based on binary oppositions such formal–informal, state–non-state or official–traditional. This reinterpretation achieves a more accurate non-dualistic understanding of Afghanistan’s traditional justice at the ethnographic micro-level. The discussion of Afghanistan´s legal ethnographies leads to renewed insights into Pospisil´s anthropological theory of law.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis

ISSN

2770-6869

e-ISSN

2770-6877

Svazek periodika

55

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

36

Strana od-do

366-401

Kód UT WoS článku

000995140800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85159918081