Scripting Refugees: Historians and Narrations of Refugeedom in Czechoslovak History

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985921%3A_____%2F22%3A00567027" target="_blank" >RIV/67985921:_____/22:00567027 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.25627/202271411254" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.25627/202271411254</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.25627/202271411254" target="_blank" >10.25627/202271411254</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Scripting Refugees: Historians and Narrations of Refugeedom in Czechoslovak History

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article analyses the current state of historical research on twentieth-century refugees who fled to Czechoslovakia. By highlighting parallels in the narratives of different types of migration, it demonstrates how methodological nationalism influences historiographic writing about refugees. It argues that most of the published research can be attributed to one of two broadly conceived scripts, one of which focuses on political refugees while the other addresses mass displacements due to war or ethnic cleansing. Political refugees are portrayed as active participants in cultural and political struggles, while the masses of refugees tend to be viewed as passive recipients of aid. The study illustrates how the production of historical sources by elite members of refugee groups on the one hand, and nation-states on the other, influences the structure of historical narratives, both in terms of what is emphasized and what goes unsaid or unheard.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Scripting Refugees: Historians and Narrations of Refugeedom in Czechoslovak History

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article analyses the current state of historical research on twentieth-century refugees who fled to Czechoslovakia. By highlighting parallels in the narratives of different types of migration, it demonstrates how methodological nationalism influences historiographic writing about refugees. It argues that most of the published research can be attributed to one of two broadly conceived scripts, one of which focuses on political refugees while the other addresses mass displacements due to war or ethnic cleansing. Political refugees are portrayed as active participants in cultural and political struggles, while the masses of refugees tend to be viewed as passive recipients of aid. The study illustrates how the production of historical sources by elite members of refugee groups on the one hand, and nation-states on the other, influences the structure of historical narratives, both in terms of what is emphasized and what goes unsaid or unheard.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung

ISSN

0948-8294

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

71

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

32

Strana od-do

555-586

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85147438322