How participants in bullying morally evaluate hypothetical bullies and defenders
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F12%3A00387834" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/12:00387834 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How participants in bullying morally evaluate hypothetical bullies and defenders
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The study examined effects of adolescents? participant role in bullying and gender on their moral evaluation of hypothetical bullying and defending protagonists. Peer nominations indicated four participant roles: aggressor, victim, defender, and uninvolved. The exploratory factor analysis of the characteristics condemning hypothetical bullies resulted in four factors: Evil Soul, Contempt, Deviance, and Cowardice. The factor analysis of the characteristics appreciating a hypothetical defender indicated five factors: General Admiration, Courage, Empathic Care, Fair Justice, and Cool. MANOVA statistics showed that the evaluator?s participant role in bullying had no main effect on the evaluation of bullies, but had main effect on the evaluation of defender. Gender proved to have main effects on both the profiles. No interactive effects were found.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How participants in bullying morally evaluate hypothetical bullies and defenders
Popis výsledku anglicky
The study examined effects of adolescents? participant role in bullying and gender on their moral evaluation of hypothetical bullying and defending protagonists. Peer nominations indicated four participant roles: aggressor, victim, defender, and uninvolved. The exploratory factor analysis of the characteristics condemning hypothetical bullies resulted in four factors: Evil Soul, Contempt, Deviance, and Cowardice. The factor analysis of the characteristics appreciating a hypothetical defender indicated five factors: General Admiration, Courage, Empathic Care, Fair Justice, and Cool. MANOVA statistics showed that the evaluator?s participant role in bullying had no main effect on the evaluation of bullies, but had main effect on the evaluation of defender. Gender proved to have main effects on both the profiles. No interactive effects were found.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
AN - Psychologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GAP407%2F12%2F2325" target="_blank" >GAP407/12/2325: Školní šikana jako proces - sociálně kognitivní analýza třídní šikany</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů