Transnational of National Cubism?. Vincenc Kramář on Cubism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378033%3A_____%2F22%3A00561583" target="_blank" >RIV/68378033:_____/22:00561583 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Transnational of National Cubism?. Vincenc Kramář on Cubism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In 1918 the first President of Czechoslovakia, the philosopher and university pedagogue Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, wrote a short treatise, first in English and French in 1918, then in Czech and in German, entitled New Europe: A Slav Standpoint, in which he raised the question of the standing of the Czechoslovak nation in Europe. According to Masaryk, between nationality and internationality there is not conflict, but agreement, nations are the natural organs of humanity. Three years after the aforementioned publications of Masaryk's New Europe, the Prague art historian Vincenc Kramář who studied art history in Vienna, published a book entitled Kubismus [Cubism], in which he extensively explained the epochal significance of the works of Picasso and Braque. Kramář declared that „national art” would not be just the „pure fruit of domestic soil”, but must also be „comprehensible abroad” and „panhuman”. Kramář wrote these words in 1921, at a time when the young state had only three years of independent existence behind it and its dramatic problems barely resolved, these were daring ideas, and decidedly did not convey what enthusiastic nationalists (patriots) wished to hear. The author shows that Kramář's defence of Cubism as a synthesis of national and transnational significance was both a gesture and a manifestation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Transnational of National Cubism?. Vincenc Kramář on Cubism

Popis výsledku anglicky

In 1918 the first President of Czechoslovakia, the philosopher and university pedagogue Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, wrote a short treatise, first in English and French in 1918, then in Czech and in German, entitled New Europe: A Slav Standpoint, in which he raised the question of the standing of the Czechoslovak nation in Europe. According to Masaryk, between nationality and internationality there is not conflict, but agreement, nations are the natural organs of humanity. Three years after the aforementioned publications of Masaryk's New Europe, the Prague art historian Vincenc Kramář who studied art history in Vienna, published a book entitled Kubismus [Cubism], in which he extensively explained the epochal significance of the works of Picasso and Braque. Kramář declared that „national art” would not be just the „pure fruit of domestic soil”, but must also be „comprehensible abroad” and „panhuman”. Kramář wrote these words in 1921, at a time when the young state had only three years of independent existence behind it and its dramatic problems barely resolved, these were daring ideas, and decidedly did not convey what enthusiastic nationalists (patriots) wished to hear. The author shows that Kramář's defence of Cubism as a synthesis of national and transnational significance was both a gesture and a manifestation.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60401 - Arts, Art history

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Nationalism and cosmopolitanism in the avant-garde and modernism. The impact of the First World War

ISBN

978-80-88283-69-0

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

174-190

Počet stran knihy

631

Název nakladatele

Artefactum

Místo vydání

Prague

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—